morals be all online- teachers share what youth-tech need to work on for species sdg

cities and smaller place brands- may be the only sustainable world trade us youth see to 2030

adam smith- 260th year of ada smiths q&a- how can peoples map best energy & intel of machine & human
abed and
sdg curriculum of engineering -2020s 27th & last decade of war between man, machine, nature
The Economist top 20 questions to leaders on saving human race by norman macrae and friends
worlds biggest maths error -design global markets to destroy youth SDGen- previously - arts & loveq saves world also yungfeng capital, and Jack Ma TV
is purpose of ecommerce to be world's biggest retailer? also &
schwarzman & 12 asian alumni networks millennials can save world with 2020 tech & humanity
Music for sdgs linking youth arts, sports,stars
AI try designing your own twitter curriculum and AI for everyone curricula
old top to - a Norman Macrae Foundation Youth Economists Project
Many failures of G8 economics - -risk to communities?? -does edu linkin virtual*real maps of Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
world record job creator- adam smith old
jinping us agriculture exchanges since 1985
curriculum of rice , & of earthquakes
we chat news
w96 deming E97 akio morita
Sustainability's top 10 clues from forst 50 yeras of Entrepreneurial Revolution
how clintons started 25 years of destroying US learning generation
china's top 20 projects inspiring sustainability of youth
How western education destroyed youth's futures
EWTP: China Thanks - Digital Free Trade Zone by Ma
who's europe is it anyway?
vote for gordon brown and chentrance
collaboration g20
Mapping Networks of World Record Jobs
China friendship regions
curriculum usa-china friendships
next Qbillion jobs of affordable healthcare
liberty &
girls peer to peer health curricula
Mapping 2017-2022 as most exciting years youth have ever celebrated
China's 5*5*5 World Class Benchmarks of Sustainability Gen
SMBa curriculum Industrial Revolution 1 to 4 - does donald get small enterprises
Billions of Jobs- valuing youth education & 17 Sustainability Goals
future of schools- by 2030 your nations future will...
Norman Macrae foundation : www library of Entrepreneurial Revolution ranking 100 leaders of youth sustainability
how to create 3 billion jobs with e-e-economics
china development
hinge moment in time
100 global youth community videos with thanks to advice from muhammad yunus
greatest #LearningGeneration - china world tours
#Learning Generation
Which nation is your nation's best partner?
w97 deming e96 morita old
world's 10 most valuable research briefings
curriculum of 30000 microfranchises -33 year update
What girls need to value most before boys about the 4 industrial revolutions
hubs world and top 9 jobs creating curricula
updating world record job creator JYK
valuetrue living systems
dear president trump Q1 is it possible for all 21st C children learn with greatest public servants?
US-sino future history curriculum
world record job creator tim berners lee
who are the greatest public servants?
ted - best and worst of media
Why isnt USAID reported as a Blockchain
g20 what germany 2017 gains from china 2017
African Friends of Jobs4Edu
cities and smaller place brands- may be the only sustainable world trade us youth see to 2030
highlights from 15 year research of collaboration cities
americas friends of
american youth ask for help in blockhcain 1000 social solution networks
emerald planet tv - make america great again
world internet summit
funders of urban upgrading
please stop jobs lying to Youth USA
will you help linkin most valuable knowhow ever shared?
learning sustains 10 times larger economy than consuming things
play game of world record job creation
4 human gamechangers in one
links to 7 wonders of world record job creators
Mapping education networks that value youth
survey of What free online education would you like?
CU2 -microeducationsummit
Why are brits so shy in celebrating youth who learn English
examining education 2030- smartest learning generation or extinction
E20- SYS Save Youth Sustainability
teacher stories
how not to mooc
China 21 WISE
help catalogue quarter billion health service jobs
Join search for world class P2P learning
Free Jobs Education
world bank's valuation of youth - 7 year audit
ibm watson startups
#learninggeneration jobs beyond classroom
Chartering Black Livelihoods Matter
Curriculum of Rice
Curriculum of Blockchain
Curriculum of Coding for All
Curriculum of Tao
Curriculum of SME by 17 goals
whats your biggest question to the world?
Jack Ma 7 Wonders Updates
can adolescent health be #1 peer to peer curriculum of netgen
Gandhi to granddad- your laws are destroying my peoples lives
Updating Global Dev Report of Obama
place brands
Sustainability MBA - Norman Macrae Jack Ma & You?
replay the morning when world bank explored how to replace economists destroying sustainability
norman macrae foundation
open space for half the world
LoveQ -what?
7 wonders of jack ma and how chinese female millennials sustained #learninggeneration - global youth's favorite university
how did youths most purposeful place generate?
world bank 2016
20 questions from a young chinese reporters first year in america
who is helping to .lower cost of quality degrees by factor of ten
G20 China Hangzhou
Youth's goodwill newsletters and social action nets
Net Generation Quarterly Newsletters Year 45
Entrepreneurial Revolution - Exploring human sustainability curricula since 1972
Global Youth Jigsaw
pin experiment
mapping china leadership networks
friends of welcome open space beijing and new york
Beyond the classroom
china quarterbilliongirls september diary
Sustainability Games - IF world service media,The Economist taken over by China,QuarterBillionGirls
Zhang Yue- one of sustainability's top 10 job creators
CBD and CHEN - CHina ENtrepreneur Forum
EconomistUniversity aka exponential SD Goal 4 Quality Education
china shows the world how to community build open space
Youth's jobs, global sustainability, China Capitalism
?where will sustainability's greatest hacks be celebrated next sustainability investors top 2 hubs : Youth Global and China Entrepreneur Network
Happy 80th to sir fazle abed
china sustainable city entrepreneurs
Edit Capitalism - designing the future
Valuing Youth - QBG Curriculum inspired by 80th birthday celebrations of Sir Fazle Abed
Open Space research with jobenomics CV
4th industrial revolution
4 pro-youth models for any sustaniability partnership
Bye bye miss america china pie
Millennials Exchanges Sustainability Map
examples of community-builing models - most exciting search around sustainability millennials planet
32 year seach for 3000- relicable social solutions for netgen jobs and community building
1 why do so few courses on ending poverty exist?
goal 3 health
why our 17 sustainability development goal curricula change columns according to chinese girls votes
11 cities sustainability development goal 11
surveys of top 10 education tech blogs
goal 2 hunger
5 gender equality sustainability development goal 5
partner search for publication of world record book of jobs creation
youth and learning as development- can quarter of a century of yazmi dream be reality of 2030now
9 macroeconomics greatest errors versus AMMA & womens microtech's inspiring solutions
Map Social World Trade - 3rd dimension of world record book of job creation
world bank live - report first day of future of youth entrepreneur summit & MIT white house demo day
Obama entrepreneur summiting completely fails africa unless green revolution comes now
curricula of changing global media
SB9 Collaboration Cafe your world & the world
How to debate whether your place has a future
sb11 merging hub and student club
SB10 league of 200 networks that could sustain world & excite 2010s
Economics of Projects
Project SB3 Planet Economics Forum needed so youth face world bank officials
SB12 Can the BBC be the EU's Media Jewel in the Crown?
SB50 Youth Ambassador 5000 - end poverty letter-writing to high places
SB2 How can we survey youth's tip 20 goals for 2020
SB64 Charter 21C's 10 paradoxes not 10 commandments
CP2 foundations as collaboration partner
Sustainability world's greatest collaborations started in University CP9
join survey of top 20 learning channels with worldwide access
Interaction 11*8: DigiYouth & Global Corp.
Survey of Schools : & SMBA Speeches of 2008
Verifying 1000 Yunus Readers of Capitalism Without Poverty grade 1 to 18
network map: milken world leaders
Directory of Yunus 1000 Research Cities
Social Business - Case definition
Sector irresponsibility cases killing off next generations
3 cheers yunus book of treasure maps - much old old
Obstacles to Dialogue Today, by Lingis
Gandhi & Compound Arithmetic
Firm Profiles
MicroFinance China
Kenya Stories
Ask about P2P
failed business cases
obama legacy includes 2/10 fail on us-china relations
CKGSB- exploring alumni
taobao monthly
newer programs at brac
Contact Us
baltimore spring 2017
is a jobs solution to north korea possible
100 greatest friends of china and sustainable youth worldwide

Editor's Note: 

The following brief is part of  Election 2016 and America’s Future— an institution-wide initiative in which Brookings scholars have identified the biggest issues facing the country this election season and are providing individual ideas for how to address them.

Election 2016 and America's Future


Donald Trump will assume the presidency at a time of enormous challenges for our country. But as all eyes focus on the president-elect himself, the actors most capable of confronting these challenges—and the ones best positioned to heal the divisions plaguing our country—are our metropolitan areas.

Metropolitan areas are the engines of our economy and stand at the vanguard of our national progress. If President-elect Trump and the Republican Congress hope to create more jobs and generate greater prosperity, they will need to develop productive relationships with the urban, suburban, and rural communities contained within our metropolitan areas.

But metropolitan areas cannot do everything on their own. They need a reliable partner in Washington that upholds the core responsibilities of the federal government, empowers local communities to live up to their full potential, and helps leverage badly needed investments in innovation, infrastructure, and children and youth.

Many of President-elect Trump’s campaign positions stand in opposition to these principles and priorities. It remains to be seen whether he and the Republican Congress understand that for our nation to thrive, our metropolitan areas must succeed.



Over the course of the past decade, American cities and metropolitan areas have firmly established themselves as the engines of the nation’s economy and as the centers of technological innovation and global trade and investment. Donald Trump’s election and Republicans’ continued control of the House and Senate put cities in uncharted territory.



Our country is facing a convergence of massive economic, demographic, and environmental challenges.  The global economy becomes more competitive by the day while economic mobility at home remains stagnant. Our elderly population is growing while underserved minority groups represent a larger share of our nation. The effects of climate change disrupt the functioning of our society ever more frequently and dramatically.

These unprecedented challenges will not be overcome without an array of new investments. We must spur innovation through greater contributions to basic science and applied research, entrepreneurial startups, and business incubators and accelerators. We must improve the standing of our middle- and lower-income populations, not just through higher wages and more affordable housing but also through greater educational investments in specialized high schools, community colleges, and vocational training. We must provide a strong platform for sustainable growth through new transportation, energy, water, and other infrastructure.

Even by conservative estimates, these investments will cost trillions of dollars over the next decade. Until these resources are raised and allocated, this “investment gap” should be at the forefront of policymakers’ minds on both sides of the aisle.

The confluence of Donald Trump’s winning the presidency and Republicans holding the House and Senate—along with increased Republican control of governorships and state legislatures—suggests that cities and metropolitan areas will be increasingly on their own in making these investments. In contrast to the partisan gridlock that characterized much of President Obama’s time in office, Washington is now poised for a burst of conservative legislative and administrative activism not seen in decades.

In a few areas, like infrastructure and defense spending, it is conceivable that greater federal investments will be forthcoming. If properly structured and implemented, these investments could be helpful to metropolitan communities. It is also possible that traditional Republican support for local control could lead to initiatives that give city and metropolitan leaders greater flexibility to combine federal resources with fewer prescriptions, a freeing up of decision making that could potentially create better outcomes on the ground.

But for the most part, the Trump era looks as if it will usher in a toxic mix of tax cuts, reductions in several types of entitlement spending, and policy shifts— like reducing our commitment to mitigating climate change—damaging to our long-term national interests. If this is the case, the responsibility for addressing major societal challenges will fall to local and metropolitan actors like never before.

Get daily updates from Brookings


Over the past several years, as partisanship hijacked the federal government and decimated its ability to serve as a partner to communities around the country, cities and metropolitan areas developed the capacity to take matters into their own hands. A New American Localism has emerged, filling the vacuum created by Washington’s departure from normal functioning. In cities and metropolitan areas, collaborative networks of business, civic, university, and political leaders have joined together to become the vanguard of national problem solving and policy innovation. They are taking on issues as diverse and complex as economic competitiveness, social mobility, climate change mitigation, and immigrant integration.

Signs of this New Localism can be seen throughout the nation.

Montgomery County, Md. and Sacramento and San Jose, Calif.  are reducing income inequality by raising the minimum wage. Broward County in Florida, King County in Washington, and San Antonio, Texas are generating hundreds of millions of dollars in local revenues to provide children with high-quality early education and other proven programs. In this election cycle, voters in Columbus, Ohio; Los Angeles; and Seattle approved $180 billion in additional taxes to spur ambitious transit expansions and more sustainable patterns of development. Private and civic investors in Indianapolis, Pittsburgh, and St. Louis are sharpening relationships between universities, companies, entrepreneurs, and business incubators, turning their cities into global centers of medical device, robotics, and genomics technology.  Like Detroit a hundred years ago and Silicon Valley 60 years ago, these cities are leveraging their distinctive advantages—often in innovation districts close to universities and medical centers—to be on the ground floor of technologies that will generate growth, wealth, and jobs for decades to come.

FLICKR/Seattle City Council - Seattle City Councilman Tim Burgess and Mayor Ed Murray visit a preschool., picture taken July 4, 2015.Seattle City Council member Tim Burgess and Mayor Ed Murray visit a preschool in July of 2015. King County, which Seattle is in, has raised local revenue to support high-quality early education.

These examples represent just a few of the places creating innovative solutions to our toughest problems. Every day brings new bottom-up approaches to the skilling of workers, the education of children, the mitigation of climate change, the commercialization of research, the financing of infrastructure, and the development of quality places for our diverse population.

The emergence of New Localism is particularly potent given the fact that our nation’s 388 metropolitan areas house 84 percent of our population and generate 91 percent of our gross domestic product. The top 100 metropolitan areas alone contain two-thirds of our population and generate three-quarters of our gross domestic product. The bottom line—as metropolitan areas succeed, so does the nation.

While the federal government must lead in many areas of national life—protecting the homeland, maintaining a strong military, providing a robust safety net for the elderly and disadvantaged, ensuring civil rights, and investing in basic science—our federalist system is an exercise in shared power. In many of the matters most critical to our future prosperity and shared growth, Washington is a small player, providing, for example, only 12 and 25 cents of every public dollar spent on K-12 education and transportation infrastructure, respectively.  State and local actors play a much more important role in promoting the vitality of our businesses, the education of our children, the quality of our infrastructure, the vibrancy of our public spaces, and the skills of our workers.

By definition, localism manifests itself differently in every community across the nation. But the leading examples of the New American Localism share a number of common principles and characteristics.

First, cities and metropolitan areas are addressing tough issues through the full power of their government, business, civic, philanthropic, university, and community networks in collaboration. This contrasts with the old approach, which relied on public-sector solutions alone and focused on more traditional federalist relationships between levels of government (particularly the federal government and the states).

Second, cities and metropolitan areas are forging their own responses to local problems that are holistic, multidisciplinary, and guided by community priorities. Cities are recognizing that spurring a local economy, improving outcomes for disconnected youth, or improving economic mobility require comprehensive, tailored approaches to the specific circumstances at hand. This energetic response sharply contrasts with strategies employed in the past—taking on problems through siloed, narrowly defined, one-size-fits-all programs often administered by slow-moving, inflexible federal agencies.


Finally, cities and metropolitan areas are rethinking their approach to financing public activities by raising, pooling, and deploying capital from an array of public, private, and civic sources at the local, national, and even global levels. They have recognized that rising mandatory spending at the federal level will inevitably push down spending on infrastructure, education, and other competitive levers, and that rising demand and population growth require greater investments. Our cities and metros are already demonstrating that the financing of critical investments will increasingly come from an unprecedented degree of collaboration across sectors and require a heightened burst of experimentation around new forms of innovative finance.


Taken together, New Localism has demonstrated the power of metros to invest in solutions to our toughest problems, boost our economy, and generate quality jobs. It represents a striking contrast to the economic insecurity and fears about globalization that drove the 2016 election.


In the past, “urban policy” has often been consigned to the margins of the federal agenda, amounting to a handful of empowerment zones, affordable housing programs, or small block grants overseen by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. But to view our nation through a localist perspective is to see urban and metropolitan purpose and power cutting across nearly every area of domestic policy and federal government agency. Issues as diverse as health care, immigration, research and development, and climate change are all “urban” in their impact. Our cities recognize this, and they must be vigilant in articulating the ways in which changes to these policies will affect their communities.

As the Trump administration begins to develop its platform of policy priorities, cities and metropolitan areas need to insist that the federal government lead where it must.

Cities and metropolitan areas need to insist that the federal government lead where it must.

Many of the disruptive forces affecting communities across the nation—global trade, wage stagnation, technological change, environmental tumult, and international migration—transcend parochial borders and require thoughtful policymaking at the federal level. The Trump administration must see its core job as acting with vision, direction, and purpose on the things that cities and metropolitan areas cannot do on their own. This includes promoting American interests overseas, investing in research and development, devising and enforcing sensible immigration policy, providing a robust safety net, and addressing climate change.

Many of the president-elect’s campaign positions on these issues are deeply troubling. Repealing the Affordable Care Act would take away health care from millions of Americans, many of whom live in metropolitan areas. In such a scenario, responsibility for emergency care treatment for the uninsured could shift back to cities and urban counties, likely swamping local budgets that are already under enormous stress. Reversals of climate policy could remove valuable incentives for investments in renewable energy. Shifts in immigration policy could divide communities, remove badly needed workers from local businesses, and distract local leaders from the many more pressing issues at hand.

Cities and metropolitan areas need to describe—with evidence, granularity, and vigor—the implications of changes to these policies. Then they need to engage in the legislative debate. Ideally, our urban communities would find a way to speak with one voice, raising practical and widespread concerns that cross the artificial boundaries of cities, counties, suburban municipalities, and rural towns.

Second, cities and metropolitan areas need to demand that the federal government empower where it should.

Given the extent to which cities have improved their performance over the past decade or so, President-elect Trump has a unique opportunity to reform Washington’s relationship with metropolitan areas. He should consider providing them with greater flexibility to adapt federal discretionary investments in transportation, housing, workforce development, education, and other areas to their specific needs and local priorities. The federal government is the largest single investor in cities, but the resources it provides are heavily prescriptive and compartmentalized, reaching their intended communities through stove-piped funding mechanisms that often roll out incoherently. This approach is fundamentally out of sync with the localist dynamic that has taken hold, and it often holds cities back. Our metropolitan areas should call for greater flexibility in exchange for greater accountability.

Any change in the provision of federal resources should be based on the principle of making federal investments more effective—not reducing their size. With the same total quantity of resources but more flexibility in how resources are spent, locally designed approaches have the potential to be more effective than federally administered ones. With regard to a wide range of particularly difficult social problems, conservative thinker Yuval Levin has written, “The absence of easy answers is precisely a reason to empower a multiplicity of problem-solvers throughout our society, rather than hoping that one problem solver in Washington gets it right.”

President Trump and the Congress should consider emulating the “City Deals” and devolution agreement process underway in the United Kingdom, which has created a vehicle for British cities to gain greater discretion in how central government funds are used locally. To qualify for a City Deal, British cities are required to organize themselves as a region, directly elect a mayor, and develop distinct plans for how centrally provided resources might be better allocated around a specific purpose. If they are able to make the central government “an offer it cannot refuse,” they are granted the flexibility to carry out their strategy. The process has incentivized the building of local capacity and has created the foundation for more effective, bottom-up solutions to tough local problems.

Congress could authorize a similar process, providing the opportunity for metropolitan areas to “apply” for the ability to allocate federal discretionary resources to a specific social, economic, or environmental outcome. This contrasts with the current system, where cities are forced to braid together many small federal grants with rigid determinations into a coherent local strategy. One community, for example, might argue for aggregating funding in a particular neighborhood to boost youth employment or educational achievement. Another might integrate housing and social service funding in a concerted effort to end homelessness. City Deals—perhaps more appropriately labeled “Community Deals” in the United States—could better align federal resources with local priorities and fully unleash the problem-solving creativity of local actors. The flexibility could be granted solely to a local government, a large non-profit, or to a consortium of public, private, and civic leaders. Regardless of the specifics from place to place, Community Deals would serve as a corrective to the notion that the dizzying array of small federal grant programs provided to local governments can somehow match the drastically varying needs and conditions on the ground.

Community Deals could also provide a vehicle for greater cross-party collaboration. In the United Kingdom, the Tory central government often worked closely with local councils controlled by the Labour Party. A similar dynamic could take hold in the United States.

In the United Kingdom, the Tory central government often worked closely with local councils controlled by the Labour Party. A similar dynamic could take hold in the United States.

Finally, cities and metropolitan areas should demand that the federal government help leverage private and civic capital to the maximum extent possible. As described above, our nation needs dramatically greater investments in a range of policy areas, and these funds cannot be provided exclusively by the public sector.

President-elect Trump has, to date, recognized this new reality inconsistently. His still-evolving infrastructure agenda seeks to provide incentives to private investors to engage. But his tax proposals follow a more traditional Republican penchant for general cuts rather than ones designed to achieve specific leverage.

From a city and metropolitan perspective on infrastructure, several things are clear:

The infrastructure deficit is very deep and differs from place to place.  Reliance on tax incentives might favor certain revenue-raising investments (e.g., toll roads) rather than others (e.g., mass transit).   Congress should allocate resources in such a way that enables cities and metropolitan areas to set their own priorities in accordance with market conditions and local preferences.

Several tax expenditure programs, like the Earned Income Tax Credit and the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit, have proven successful and should be expanded as part of any tax reform package.

Several tax incentive programs, like the Low Income Housing Tax Credit and the New Markets Tax Credit, work quite well and should not only be preserved but expanded.

If tax reform proceeds, cities and metropolitan areas need their own proposals.  Why not, for example, offer tax incentives for investments in qualified companies that seek either to grow jobs in distressed areas or craft market solutions to challenges in these communities?



As noted above, a Trump presidency and a Republican Congress could produce greater investments in certain areas and significant cutbacks in others. In either case, cities and metropolitan areas will still need to raise substantial capital on their own in order to make meaningful and durable investments in innovation, infrastructure, human capital, children, and quality places—in other words, the investments needed to fuel productive, inclusive, and sustainable growth.

The financing strategies used by cities and metros are becoming increasingly sophisticated. Oftentimes, resources are pooled and combined in intricate ways, enabling communities to make necessary investments. A new field of “Metropolitan Finance” is emerging which needs to be captured, codified, and leveraged across the nation.

First, new financial instruments and practices have the potential to channel private and civic capital toward a number of nontraditional activities, like initiatives related to inclusivity or environmental sustainability. Much attention has been paid to impact investing and Pay for Success bonds, recently used in Salt Lake County to expand prekindergarten to economically disadvantaged children. New instruments are also springing up in other areas of policy. Green Bonds, for example, have emerged as a way to fund clean energy and energy-efficiency projects. Consensus is also building around treating large regeneration projects as a single asset class, lowering the barriers to investing in massive, economy-shaping projects like London’s Kings Cross.

Second, new intermediaries are emerging to bring disparate sectors of society together, a process essential in improving access to capital, creating opportunity, and spurring economic growth. Connectors like the Cambridge Innovation Center in Massachusetts have matched startups to experts and seed funding. Hubs like Chicago’s 1871 have paired large companies like United Airlines and State Farm with entrepreneurial firms and talent.  Social innovators like LaunchCode in St. Louis have linked newly minted coders to good jobs in mature companies.  Other intermediaries like the Texas Medical Center in Houston and Bio CrossRoads in Indianapolis are acting as the connective tissue between large anchor institutions (like hospitals and universities) to achieve greater innovation through collaboration.

Finally, new breeds of special-purpose public, quasi-public, and civic institutions are forming to unlock the value of underutilized public assets and finance a wide range of transformative projects. HafenCity Hamburg GmbH, a company owned by the City of Hamburg, is overseeing the largest inner-city regeneration effort in Europe through the redevelopment of former port and industrial sites.  In Copenhagen, CPH City and Port Development, a company jointly owned by the municipal and national governments, is developing areas along the waterfront.  In the United States and elsewhere, community land trusts have provided stable foundations for affordable housing. And CORTEX in St. Louis and 22@ in Barcelona have governed the build-out of innovation districts in those two cities.


The 2016 election showed that our country needs more than jobs and economic security—we need to bridge the chasm that divides cities and rural areas as well as racial and ethnic groups. This will not happen in our nation’s capital. The national political parties often regard distinct places and demographic groups as constituency groups to be scared, manipulated, and mobilized against each other.

We need to bridge the chasm that divides cities and rural areas as well as racial and ethnic groups. This will not happen in our nation’s capital.

Unlike the federal government, metropolitan areas unite geographies and disparate groups. They encompass central cities, suburbs, exurbs, and, due to sprawling development patterns, hundreds of rural communities. Fully half of the people living in rural areas are actually part of greater metropolitan regions. Everyone within a specific metro area is bound together by shared labor and housing markets, they are stuck in the same traffic jams; they root for the same sports teams; and they share an interest in improving their mutual quality of life.

Localism by its nature engages stakeholders across ideological and jurisdictional lines. In communities like Denver and Minneapolis/St.Paul, Democrats and Republicans have learned to do at the metro level what they seem incapable of doing at the national, namely recognizing common interests and compromising to get things done. It is not always easy and there are often loud, impassioned detractors. But local community networks—unlike ideologically rigid national parties—ultimately reward action and punish obstruction.

A picture looking down 17th St. towards the main facade of Denver's Union Station, decorated for the holidays. taken on December 10, 2014 by Isaac Kim (WIKIMEDIA).Denver and its surrounding communities worked together to develop a shared transit plan, FasTracks, and collaborate on economic development.

Particularly in this time of raw division, metropolitan communities need to perfect a new style of collaborative governance, one that works across jurisdictions and alongside businesses and civic institutions. Coming together as a nation is not solely dependent on the federal government getting its act together—cities and metros have enormous potential here that has yet to be realized.


As Washington springs back to life under one-party rule, the notion that the president and Congress run the country will no doubt take hold. But the reality is more complicated. Washington is large, but it is not in charge.

America’s resiliency is strengthened by a division of responsibilities that empowers communities to come together in improving the lives of their residents. Over the next several years, the hard business of investing in the future and uniting the nation will most likely not be conducted in Washington. Rather, it will occur in our metropolitan regions, where leaders and residents in our cities, suburbs, exurbs, and rural areas will work together to find common ground and purpose. It remains to be seen if Republicans, now in control of our national institutions, will choose to strengthen or stymie this dynamic.

Read more in the Election 2016 and America’s Future series.

The Centennial Scholar Initiative cultivates a new style of scholarship at Brookings, fostering work that is cross-program, inter-disciplinary, international, and intensely focused on impact.

Enter subhead content here

this isnt all bad news - as optimal hub networks are wehen much of greatest innovation is now designed

the big secret is education (now it can be scaled through eg moocs to million people networks) is the only smart sustainable media- any brand leader who continues to spend big budgets on ad messages in battles to addict your mind rather than sharing knowhow to action communally isnt worth  societies of youth buying or producing a thing with

meanwhile which economics networks now support places below national level as the way to grow the human economy

we lie brrokings as perha[s te only m,ajor usa economoics instutute - tell us if your coiuntry has something similar



Agenda: Xconomy Intersect: Innovating Where Disciplines Collide

 12:30  1:30Registration & Networking
 1:30  1:40Welcome
Jim Edwards, Xconomy
Benjamin Romano, Xconomy
 1:40  2:00Speech in the Multi-Sense World
Xuedong Huang, Microsoft
 2:00  2:25Human Writing in an Age of Intelligent Machines
Kieran Snyder, Textio
Greg Bear, Author
Benjamin Romano, Xconomy (Moderator)
 2:25  2:35Audience Q&A
 2:35  3:05Innovation in the Time of Trump—A Policy Perspective
Margaret O’Mara, University of Washington
Kirk Washington, W Fund
Michael McGinn, Former Mayor of Seattle
David Ferris, Reporter, E&E News (Moderator)
 3:05  3:30Investor-Entrepreneur Story: OfferUp
Hans Tung, GGV Capital
Nick Huzar, OfferUp
Peter Wilson, OfferUp
 3:30  4:00Networking Break
 4:00 – 4:30Creating Intersections: Modern Approaches to Technology Transfer
Vikram Jandhyala, University of Washington
Rosemarie Truman, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Paul Levins, Xinova
Bill Bryant, DFG (Moderator)
 4:30 – 5:00Fast Pitches: Orchards, Forests, Insects
Lav Khot
, Washington State University
Grant Canary, DroneSeed
Virginia Emery, Beta Hatch
 5:00 – 5:30Healthcare, IT, and the Cloud’s Impact on Everything
Rajeev Singh
, Accolade
Matt McIlwain, Madrona Venture Group
 5:30 – 6:30Networking Reception


*Schedule is subject to change.

Enter content here

Enter content here

education coalitions


Enter supporting content here


Alibaba founder Jack Ma unveils ambitious plan

Mission: 100 million new jobs

By Dana McCauley

He already runs the world's biggest online shopping company, but Alibaba founder Jack Ma is not satisfied.

The Chinese billionaire has unveiled an even more ambitious plan to expand the company's reach across the globe, creating 100 million new jobs and transforming the global economy to create a more equitable world.

It may sound pie-in-the-sky, but the goal forms part of mission statement of the US$261 billion company's visionary executive chairman.

In a letter to shareholders, Ma outlined Alibaba's achievements of the past financial year - including a gross merchandise turnover of more than $195 billion (1 trillion RMB), an "unprecedented" figure - before looking to the future.

"We have more than 430 million annual active buyers, which means one out of every three individuals in China has made a purchase on our retail marketplaces," Ma wrote.

But, he said, while proud of Alibaba's online shopping achievements, "we want to do far more", saying that the benefits of globalisation had not been spread evenly, but that "digital disruption will bring us closer to a level playing field for young people and small businesses".

"We are not merely trying to shift buy/sell transactions from offline to online, nor are we changing conventional digital marketing models to squeeze out a little additional profit," he wrote.

"We are working to create the fundamental digital and physical infrastructure for the future of commerce, which includes marketplaces, payments, logistics, cloud computing, big data and a host of other fields."

The Alibaba group of companies, founded in 1999, accounts for 60 per cent of all Chinese online sales, and this year overtook Walmart as the world's largest retailer.


It has made Ma the second richest man in Asia, with a net worth of US$28.5 billion.


It's through cloud computing that Alibaba aims to expand its reach, and the company has been investing in the technology as part of a strategy that sees shoppers' data as the contemporary equivalent of mineral riches.

"Over the next 30 years, with computing power as the new 'technology breakthrough' and data as the new 'natural resource,' the landscape of retail, financial services, manufacturing and entertainment will be transformed," Ma wrote, forecasting a decades-long period of transformation.

"The internet revolution is a historical inflection point, much like when electricity was introduced, and it may have an even greater impact," he predicted.

Alibaba's mission, he said, was to "empower merchants with the ability to transform and upgrade their businesses for the future" and "help companies all over the world to grow".

"We believe, the commerce infrastructure we have created in China - marketplaces, payments, logistics, cloud computing and big data, all working in concert - can be applied on a global scale to lift up small and medium businesses and ordinary consumers around the world."

Eight years after launching, Alibaba Cloud hosts 35 per cent of Chinese websites, while delivering cloud computing and big data services.


Ma said Alibaba was constantly adapting to the changing e-commerce environment, as staying at the forefront of innovation was key to its continued success.

"In the coming years, we anticipate the birth of a re-imagined retail industry driven by the integration of online, offline, logistics and data across a single value chain," he said.

"With e-commerce itself rapidly becoming a "traditional business," pure e-commerce players will soon face tremendous challenges."

A shift to mobile revenue was one such change, he said, with mobile climbing from a single-digit percentage to three-years of total revenue from Alibaba's Chinese retail marketplaces, in the space of two years.

"This is why we are adapting, and it's why we strive to play a major role in the advancement of this new economic environment," Ma said.

Innovations like Alibaba's Qianniu app, which helps online businesses to improve sales and marketing while enhancing efficiency, were an example of the type of projects the company aimed to focus on.

"In 20 years, we hope to serve two billion consumers around the world, empower 10 million profitable businesses and create 100 million jobs," Ma said, adding: "This will be an even more difficult journey than the one behind us."

LISTEN : Newstalk ZB Political Editor Barry Soper speaks to Andrew Dickens on KPMG Early Edition

Mr Ma - who's worth around $50 billion - met with John Key in Beijing late yesterday. He made his money through founding the online commerce platform Ali Baba.

Standing alongside the Prime Minister, he heaped praise on the country, which he says is loved by many Chinese.

"At least 20 of my colleagues retired from Ali Baba. They're all very young, in their 40s, they all go to New Zealand."

"I asked what they do apart from the golf and green things and they say it's the people there."

It wasn't all social, with the Chinese billionaire also talking business.

Jack Ma told the entrepreneurs luncheon Kiwi businesspeople find it difficult to access the Chinese market.

Mr Ma said he wants to make that easier with his multi-platform organisation.

"We have Ali Baba University. We would either have courses in New Zealand or invite the entrepreneurs in New Zealand to stay in China for two weeks for training."

"The second is that we're going to open an Ali Baba business embassy next year in New Zealand."

John Key is in China meeting business and political leaders.



Innovation "Made in China" - The Case of Alibaba and the role of Net-based Small Business

Innovation is a key driver for economic development and social progress and small business is one of the best ways for people to express their willingness and capability to innovate.  Pervasive business ownership has, therefore, been the foundation in many societies for the continued improvement of people’s economic wellbeing. In the People’ Republic of China, however, private business ownership was prohibited between 1957 and 1978. Productive innovations were extremely restricted and as a consequence, China’s economy was on the verge of collapse by the end of 1978. The Chinese people had suffered a historic setback.

Alibaba’s growth, driven by unleashing grassroots entrepreneurship, has become an exemplar of China’s innovation in the 21st century.  Started by 18 young people in 1999, Alibaba has grown into a giant global internet platform and has made many invaluable contributions to China’s progress. Highlighting the importance of pervasive small business ownership in unleashing grassroots innovation and improving economic wellbeing, Professor Lowrey will discuss Alibaba’s innovative strategies and explain the economic theory behind its inspiring success.




Dr. Ying Lowrey is Professor of Economics at Tsinghua University and Deputy Director of the Tsinghua Research Center for Chinese Entrepreneurs, and a member of the Academic Committee for Alibaba Group Research Institute. Her teaching and research interests include economics of innovation and entrepreneurship in the internet and platform economy, the modern microfinance market, business demographics, characteristics of business owners, and the role of free enterprise and competition in the macroeconomy. 

She received her economics Ph.D. from Duke University, economics MA from Yale University and mathematics BS from Wuhan University. Before joining Tsinghua University in 2012, she served as senior economist at the Office of Advocacy, U.S. Small Business Administration and has taught economics at George Washington University and San Diego State University.


Selected publications 




Founder of Ali Baba commits his work for Chinese on internet to generate 100 million microentrepren…chris macraeNov 23, 200950 views

Founder of Ali Baba commits his work for Chinese on internet to generate 100 million microentrepreneur jobs in 2010s - who else would you vote at the centre of 100 million job creation leagues?
=====================update sumer 2016:
unlike oiher years spent with bangaldeshi inspired youth, i spent 2015-2016 mainly with a class of chinese female students - what brilliant minds and tirelss sources of human energy - i hope this summary of why the whole world can celebrate what jack ma is doing is near to the mark - but as always look forward to editing any errors which are mine alone washington dc text 240 316 8157
was english language tutoring

In 1995 he was sent to the usa on an exchange mission and encountered the worldwideweb - then unknown in China. He determined the www would be the biggest job creating innovation of his (or his generations) life and hopefully of every Chinese entrepreneur he could valuably link into.

Over the next 15 years his wizard coding teams went from something that was little more than an electronic yellow pages for small businesses to conceiving sustainability generation's 2 greatest retailing platforms china or the world may ever have seen..

the taobao platform is the most valuable job creating concept retailers have ever mediated because it reverses the western trend of globalisiation of retailers, bankers and big corporations squeezing out local and small enterprises from having a market; how taobao did that is an extraordinarily detailed story but note how Ma was concerned to ensure even the most cut-off of Chinese villagers could start up on tao bao (rural ecommerce is one of the innovations that Ma has led the www purpose to linkin)

His other mall was pitched at the more usual high cost fashions of big global merchandisers. Because of complex property laws in chinese cities, most expensive retailers are not much of a joy to shop in. So ali baba created a lifestyle -eg celebrate singles day 11/11 shopping virtually rather than the physically exhausting interaction in The West's biggest shopping days of the year)

SO 365/24/7 consumers of ali baba can choose who they value developing most with their purchasing power as well as searching merchandise with global image or local cultural joy

Alibaba has become china's and probably the word's largest retailing channel. It does this with next to no merchandise but brilliant coding so that every store front on its platforms delivers with equal reliability. Hunting out exactly how Ma forms partnerships so that big data analysis benefits the smallest enterprises and most local consumers ought to be a job of whomever is sustainability goals greatest economist.

Intriguingly to ensure he could compete with the chinese internet companies that raced to co-create the www that Ma had opened space for in china, Ma IPO'd Alibaba through a process 2010-2015 while developing his secret sustainability weapon under private ownership. AlIpay is china's number 1 financial inclusion delivery system and maybe global youth most humanly productive coding achievement to date.

Comparing china's top 10 internet properties with the west's is very interesting. Are the consuming behaviours on ali baba more sustainable than those on amazon or ebay or paypal? Are the learnng behaviours on baidu more sustaining of youth than on google or coursera or microsoft's linkedin. Time will tell but note how speaking english, chinese and coding (as well as mother tongue) are probably what educators anywhere on planet earth should NOW be most valuing their global youth's future freedom to thrive entrepreneurially around.

Powered by xx