How to debate whether your place has a future

SMBA Open Curriculum & World Citizen Certification

To begin with let's been optimistic. Historically the human race has been nature's favourite because its had the best purpose in investing in its future generation. Moreover the 2010 negen decade is one we can at least double our knowledge to lead anything as long as we choose the focus our race needs.. Conversely if we choose a focus that devalues our next generation, we cant aford to half that knowledge capability 10 times in a row. So its up to everyone to raise this debate but it is one where elders should empower the most curious questions of youth freely, openly and bravely

(Left below) There are some debates that are becoming well known. Here the trouble is experts may spot over simplification or data errors in this notes suggestions of what to ask about first. If these experts wish to be constructive they can send us info@worldcitizen.tv links to the dat they believe your world should look at first - we will try our best to publish this or subscribe

(Right below). There are detaes that few are yet voicing. Strangely the erisk to raising these debates may seem to be that they are "anti-social". Actually asking society to rethnk itself may be the most social question you will ever demand

All problems relate to bubbles of the sort where humanity has got on the wrong side of a pair of expoential curves - where leaders and those commanding the sector are on a journey of exponential destruction even wile in most cases their professions are advising them they are growing stuff

Known Bubbles

Pensions particularly but not solely among every interacting level of government over you

Healthcare bubbles

Currency bubbles

Property bubbles

Bubbles caused by institutions that rule over who fails to the extent that even when they fail they make up a special rule that they alone cannot fail

Lesser known bubbles

The cost of famous people goes over 10% of everything you buy ; and these people are famous for trivial or self-gratifying preoccupations not sustainable pursuits

The way that non-hippocratic global professions emerged in the 1980s - by definition of the great netfuture debates (1984 and all that) numbers had to be reported more locally (transparent, sustainably, multiplying deep community goodwill) in the pre-electronic networked age (1970s and earlier)

Paradox of freedom to move - so if as a young person you conclude the place you came from is a bubble and can transfer to a non-bubble place, what is the consequence in a nation or region (eg EU) where everyone who can deserts some places and crowds into others leaving the old or the infants or the historically abused behind to fend for themselves in an ever more collapsing place -extraordinary solution; Storytell: The Economist & 11 Plus of Microcredit

Enter content here

Enter supporting content here